• Introduction

    1. Conditionings of GPT as the basic problem

    2. Basic mistakes of GPT

    3. Was the analysis of GPT responses useful from the TGD viewpoint?

  • Prompt 1: Explain in detail how the M4 × CP2 geometry is induced to the spacetime surface in TGD and how the field equations are solved?

    1. Basic notions

    2. Geometry of the embedding space H=M4× CP2

    3. From 8-D to 4-D: projective anatomy of a space-time surface

    4. Action principle: Kähler + volume

    5. Euler-Lagrange equations and "preferred extremals"

    6. How standard field equations emerge

  • Prompt 2: Meaning of holography= holomorphy (H-H) hypothesis; how does it solve field equations, imply to ZEO and solve quantum measurement problem?

    1. What is holography= holomorphy (H-H) hypothesis?

    2. How does H-H solve the field equations?

    3. Why does H-H lead to the zero-energy ontology (ZEO)?

    4. How does ZEO claim to solve the fundamental problem of measurement theory?

    5. Skeptic's check list

    6. Summary with a critical eye

  • Prompt 3: What do induced geometry and induced spinor structure mean? What does the Dirac equation mean in TGD (use the latest material)

    1. Induced geometry

    2. Induced spinor structure

    3. 3 Dirac equations in TGD

    4. What does the Dirac equation mean in practice?

    5. Open questions and the memory list of skeptic

    6. Summary

  • Prompt 4: How does TGD differ from general relativity? How do TGD-inspired cosmology and astrophysics differ from what GRT predicts?

    1. Basic geometry and fields

    2. Cosmology: what changes?

    3. Astrophysics, black holes, stars

    4. Summary of differences

  • Prompt 5: How does the particle physics predicted by TGD differ from that predicted by the Standard Model?

    1. Key differences

    2. Gauge symmetries and interactions

    3. Particles

    4. The origin of masses and mixings

    5. Hierachy of Planck constants and dark matter

    6. Consequences from the data

    7. Short memory list of differences

    8. Bottom line

  • Prompt 6: How should we stress test and attack this concept, be skeptic about?

    1. Quick take summary

    2. Mathematical consistency checks

    3. Compatibility with established physics

    4. Empirical attack vectors

    5. Numerical and constructive stress tests

    6. Philosophical hygiene

    7. Failure modes to watch for

    8. Roadmap for a rigorous crash-test programme

    9. Bottom line

  • Prompt 7: Which of those tests have already been done?

    1. Precision electroweak and flavour tests

    2. Muon magnetic anomaly

    3. Cosmic-string sector

    4. Collider searches for new resonances

  • Conclusions

    1. Analysis of O3's recurring pitfalls

    2. Concrete Payoffs from the O3-Assisted TGD session