Higgs and p-adic mass calculations

In the earlier blog posting I told that the boundary condition for the Kähler-Dirac equation is massless Dirac equation with the analog of Higgs term added. The interpretation in terms of Higgs mechanism however fails since the term can be also tachyonic. Intriguingly, p-adic mass calculations require the ground state conformal weight to be negative half odd integer. This raises the question whether the the boundary condition for Kähler-Dirac equation could be equivalent for the mass formulation given by the condition that the scaling generator L0 annihilates the physical states for Super Virasoro representations. This equivalence is suggested by quantum classical correspondence.

If this is the case, the two mass shell conditions would be equivalent. This possibility is discussed more precisely below.

  1. The boundary condition for K-D equation reads as

    (pkγk+ Γn)Ψ=0 .

    (pkγk is algebraic Dirac operator in Minkowski space and Γn is Kähler Dirac gamma matrix defined as contraction of the canonical energy momentum current of Kähler action with imbedding space gamma matrices.

    Mass shell condition corresponds to the vanishing of the square of the algebraic Dirac operator and should be equivalent with the mass shell condition given by the vanishing of the action of L0:

    pkpk== p2= m02× (hgr +n) ==mn2 .

    m0 is CP2 mass scale dictated by CP2 size scale and analogous to that given by string tension. m0 is evaluated for the standard value of Planck constant. hgr is ground state conformal weight and n is the conformal weight assignable to the Super-Virasoro generators creating the state.

    p-Adic mass calculations require that hgr is negative and half odd integer valued so that ground state would be tachyonic. The first principle explanation for this could be the presence of Minkowskian time-like contribution in Γn coming from the canonical momentum density for Kähler action. One cannot exclude a p-adically small deviation of hgr from the negative half odd integer value proportional to at least second power of prime p perhaps assignable to Higgs like contribution or contribution of string like objects assignable to elementary particle.

  2. One can decompose Γn to M4 and CP2 parts corresponding to the contractions of the canonical momentum density with M4 and CP2 gamma matrices respectively:

    Γn = Tn(M4)+ Tn(CP2) .

    Tn(M4) involves M4 gamma matrices is determined by the energy momentum tensor TK of Kähler action determined by its imbedding space variation coming from the induced metric. Tn(CP2) involves CP2 gamma matrices and is sum coming from the imbedding space variations coming from a variation with respect to the induced metric and induced Kähler form. M4 and CP2 contributions are orthogonal to each other as imbedding space vectors.

  3. The square of the mass boundary condition gives

    (p+Tn(M4))k(p+Tn(M4))k +Tnk(CP2)Tnk(CP2)=0 .

    This condition can be simplified if one assumes that the direction of classical energy momentum density vector Tnk(M4) is same as four momentum pk. This assumption is motivated by quantum classical correspondence. This would give

    Tnk(M4)= α (x) pk .

    The coeffcient α can depend on the position along string.

  4. With these assumptions the condition reads

    (1+α)2 p2 +Tnk(CP2)Tnk(CP2)=0 .

    and gives

    Tnk(CP2)Tnk(CP2)/(1+α)2=- mn2 .

    where mn2 is the mass squared associated with the state as given by the vanishing of L0 action on the state.

    In coordinate changes the left hand changes in position dependent manner but the change of the factor α compensates the change of T2(CP2) term so that the condition is general coordinate invariant statement.

  5. Combiging this with the mass shell condition coming from the vanishing of the action of L0 gives

    Tnk(CP2)Tnk(CP2)= -(1+α)2m02(hgr+n) .

    One can solve α from this condition:

    α=+/- S/Mn -1 , S2k== - Tnk(CP2)Tnk(CP2) (≥ 0) .

  6. The interpretation of the effective metric defined by the Kähler-Dirac gamma matrices has been a longstanding problem. It seems that the geffnn of this metric appears naturally if one assumes that Super-Virasoro conditions for L0 is equivalent with that given by the boundary condition for Kähler-Dirac equation.
The conclusion is that the Higgs like term could provide classical space correlate for the basic stringy mass formulate. p-Adic mass calculations apply thermodynamics with mass squared replacing the energy in the usual thermodynamics. In Zero Energy Ontology p-adic thermodynamics is replaced with its square root and one would have quantum superposition of space-time surfaces with mass squared values mn2 with probabilities given by p-adic thermodynamics. The 3-momenta could be identical for these contributions but energies would differ. This does not break Lorenz invariance but would mean extremely small breaking of time translation invariance characterized by the inverse of p-adic prime. The breaking is of the order of of 10-38 for electron characterized by Mersenne prime M127. For the evolution of TGD view about the relationship of Higgs mechanism and p-adic mass calculations see the chapter "Recent view about Kähler geometry and spin structure of WCW".